Dear PiePie,
Increasing, we will be outsourcing doing of the ‘work’ to AI. And oftentimes, it will be faster and broadly more efficient to do so.
And yet, sometimes we might miss that the process of doing the ‘work’ is, in and of itself, valuable and an output as well. When we write, we are thinking. We are reasoning with ourselves if a particular word or phrase captures our thoughts – why and why not – and in so doing, testing the thinking with which we do. In paying attention to the details, we are building mental models within ourselves about how to grasp a particular area. Those are valuable. A video by mathematician Terence Tao gives other examples of why there is value in doing things in a slow way.
Thus, whilst we live in an output-first society, and the pressure to get to output is incredibly high (after all, who has time to use a less efficient means to get something done if the benefits of it are so unclear and uncertain), it isn’t a bad idea to sometimes choose a more tedious path.
While this statement might sound extremely Luddite, it’s something to be remembered as society starts to adopt AI and be AI-first. It reminds of a quote from Robert Pirsig ‘Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry Into Values’:
It’s the sides of the mountain which sustain life, not the top. Here’s where things grow. But of course, without the top you can’t have any sides. It’s the top that defines the sides.
Love, Dad
